Brooke Austin vs Sanaz Marand Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W L L
Form
W L W W W L W W L LH2H: Austin 1 - 1 Marand
They have played 4 sets in total, with Austin winning 2 and Marand winning 2. The last match between Austin and Marand was at the Stockton, 13-07-2015, First, Hard with Sanaz Marand getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brooke Austin | 1 |
| Sanaz Marand | 1 |
Stockton(13-07-2015)
7
5
7
5
| Austin | Stats | Marand |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 424 | Highest Rank | 242 |
| 29 | Age | 36 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (74-52) | Career Total W/L | 54% (245-206) |
| $8,638 | Career Prize Money | $8,030 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brooke Austin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-7(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Valeriya Solovyeva
Player
Brooke Austin
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Brooke Austin
40%
(
21 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
view more
Sanaz Marand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maria Kononova
Player
Sanaz Marand
43%
(
15 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Sanaz Marand
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Alycia Parks
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
12
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanie Voegele
Player
Sanaz Marand
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Ingrid Neel
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Beatrice Gumulya
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Victoria Flores
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Sanaz Marand
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Tori Kinard
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (74/52) | Win/Loss | 54% (245/206) |
| 56% (160/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (558/471) |
| 53% (1370/1222) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4813/4446) |
| 60% (55/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (138/115) |
| 59% (19/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (95/78) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1 | Aces Total | 113 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 57 | Total Double Faults | 287 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 599.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 592.04 |
| 61% (233/385) | 1st Serve % | 68% (6667/9868) |
| 54% (125/233) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (3891/6667) |
| 30% (46/152) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1570/3201) |
| 48% (23/48) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (543/1152) |
| 43% (169/396) | Return Points Win % | 45% (4315/9677) |
| 33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (35/34) | Challenger W/L | 53% (192/169) |
| 72% (38/15) | Futures W/L | 65% (46/25) |
| 58% (73/125) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (240/445) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (12/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (38/77) |
| 65% (22/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (58/132) |
| 90% (70/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (268/216) |
| 10% (70/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (268/52) |
| 20% (56/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (182/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
